This topic is one of my favourites because it revolves around quirkily, schneakily and creatively beating around the bush before you set it on fire.

The art of a good conversation is longevity and a sense of youth of the subject.

We easily fall into habits of not uncovering the mystery within what is being said – so one of my tactix is to become aware of the majesty in an act of tapping into the wonder.

It makes conversing fun by sidestepping the obviously implied too harshly, tuning into that awakening energy and then finding a way of tailoring ones next words with such detail, yet in the spirit of a gentle touch so that they might meet their mark.

It is a subtlety that is precarious at times in our determined world – for we must side step the old, used and down trodden narratives in the subtext to shed light on a new way of seeing things with our eyes open.

Evading contradiction and too extreme stances yields a feeling of personal security in ones opinion – not having to defend immediately as one is too used to in ultimatum scenarios.

The question is how long can you last not having to face direct evidence that seems to be irrefutable within the confines of the part taker in the conversation.

There are many techniques one can adopt – much of which deal with the strategy of making things safe to deliver the final argument in a harmless way.

It has a sense of birthing an idea that will hold. Working on a good base before gently opening the door to a realization instead of defeat or victory.

We are so accustomed to a win/lose stage that we forget that there is only one coin.

Long gone are the days of black and white – this is outmoded in my opinion. Holistic perception deals with seeing AND believing. This requires proof AND understand.

So who would enter a debate that he is not ready for? Overzealous and greedy individuals that seek an end instead of new beginnings will surely not do well in a field of rounded, optimistic yet not blue eyed and diplomatic perceptions.

We can only share our perspective and there is not real overmind besides the ones you appoint for yourself. So why aren’t we being humble and sharing recyclable opinions instead of hard and chiselled facts?